Home
»
News Articles
»
State of the Nation 2012: Energy, business in economic reforms and Budget implications
State of the Nation 2012: Energy, business in economic reforms and Budget implications
Posted : Wednesday, June 27, 2012
 |
|
- Budget 2012
Dr Martin Parkinson, Secretary, Department of the
Treasury
- Breakfast with the
Opposition
The Hon Tony Abbott MHR, Leader of the
Opposition
- Financing Australia's Future - Long term
versus short term
Senator the Hon Penny Wong, Minister for Finance
and Deregulation
- Energy Security
The Hon Martin Ferguson AM MP, Minister for
Resources and EnergEnergy Security
- Panel participant -
Productivity, Welfare, Work: Rethinking our tax
structure
Greg Smith, Adjunct Professor,
Australian Catholic University
- Panel participant - White Paper:
Australia in the Asian Century
Adjunct Professor, Michael Hintze, Fellow, Centre
for International Security Studies
|
CEDA's 2012 State of the Nation provided insight from
experts on critical issues for Australia including the transition
of our energy sector, the role of the business community in
economic reforms and Budget implications.
Key speakers included Treasury Secretary Dr Martin Parkinson,
Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott, Ministers Martin Ferguson,
Penny Wong, Chris Evans and Bill Shorten and Productivity
Commission Chairman, Gary Banks.
Speeches and discussions from this year's State of the
Nation received widespread media attention highlighting the
relevance and timeliness of the discussions on these key topics.
Below is a synopsis of key sessions and speakers. Audios and full
speeches are included where available.
Department of
the Treasury, Secretary, Dr Martin Parkinson
Australia is well placed to deal with further economic turmoil,
was a key message from Department of Treasury Secretary, Dr Martin
Parkinson, in his keynote address on day one of CEDA's State of the
Nation in Canberra.
He said the recent Greek election did not eliminate risk, and
the absence of political will in Europe to implement policies
better suited to the circumstances confronting the Eurozone member
countries, remained a key issue.
However, he said Australia had capacity to respond to any new
crisis and maintain its relatively strong economic position.
Dr Parkinson said it was no accident Australia was in such a
strong position and the current economic framework had served us
well, but we need to continue to foster and build on that framework
for coming generations.
He said the three pillars of our macroeconomic framework were a
floating exchange rate, independent monetary policy and fiscal
policy, underpinned by structural policies that have fostered
flexibility and growth.
"It is our frameworks that have stood us in good stead through
the global financial crisis and recent period of structural change,
and they will continue to do so," he said.
"And if you don't believe this, ask yourself the following
questions: What would Australia look like today had any one of
those policy pillars been missing in recent years?"
Dr Parkinson said the current economic climate had resulted in
suggestions by some to dismantle or undermine this framework but
"it is important that we maintain and build on these assets".
He said the four big drivers of economic change for Australia
were the growth of the middle class in China and India, our ageing
population, environmental sustainability and emerging
technology.
"If we can respond to these challenges the next two decades will
be as prosperous, if not more so, than the past two decades," he
said.
Commenting on the role and current contribution of business in
future reforms, Dr Parkinson said business has to be a central
player in policy development and Australia has "done the best when
we've had robust and respectful discussions".
"There is a degree of disgruntlement in the business community
that is making it hard for them to participate in those debates in
a way that they should at the moment," he said.
"I don't mean that people aren't willing to talk, but it seems
there can't be discourse without criticism.
"We need to take the heat out of the debate and get back to
doing what we've done well as a society which is to talk
thoughtfully, carefully and respectfully, based on data, about the
choices available to us and how we might get there.
"We can only deliver big reforms if government has the political
capital to expend and we can only have governments with political
capital to expend, and this applies to State and Federal
Governments and to whoever is in power, if there is agreement about
the general direction."
On questioning about why Australia had done so much better than
New Zealand, despite having similar economic frameworks, Dr
Parkinson said it was a combination of more investment in skills
and education, being more open to trade, diverse migration and our
resource endowment.
Full speech
Event audio (member login required)
Political round-up
Opposition Leader
sets our priorities
The issues on Federal Opposition Leader, Tony
Abbott's, agenda when he addressed CEDA's State of the
Nation attendees included removing the carbon tax, recent
attacks on business leaders and spending cuts.
On the Budget, Mr Abbott said a surplus was achieved by "cooking
the books" and would only be achieved if everything goes right for
the Gillard Government, "and as we know from this Government, which
has the Midas touch in reverse, most things don't go right for this
Government".
He said the Opposition was currently going through the Budget to
look at programs that could be cut and a priority if elected would
be to get spending down.
Mr Abbott said examples of possible cuts included $300 million
spent by the Commonwealth with the states to improve literacy and
numeracy rates without "making any appreciable difference" and $600
million spent by the Commonwealth with the states to reduce
hospital elective surgery waiting times when they have "actually
got longer not shorter".
"We are going through the budget line by line, program by
program, to identify aspects of Commonwealth spending which we not
believe are making an appreciable difference to the lives of the
Australian people because economies can and must be made," he
said.
On the carbon tax, Mr Abbott said the first order of business if
elected would be to remove it and it can be done.
"There is a simple constitutional principle that no Parliament
can bind its successor. What has been done by legislation can and
will be undone by legislation," he said.
In conclusion he said that a Coalition Government would never
make the sort of attacks on leading business figures seen in recent
months or attempt to create a "phoney class war".
"Governments can hinder wealth creation, they can't create it
themselves. Only profitable private business in the long run can
create the wealth that is needed to sustain a cohesive and strong
society such as ours," he said.
Full speech
Event audio (member login required)
Minister for
Finance and Deregulation, Penny Wong
Increasing productivity is key to managing our changing
demography, Minister for Finance and Deregulation, Penny Wong, has
told CEDA's State of the Nation attendees.
"As the number of workers relative to those out of work
declines, the productivity of our economy needs to increase," she
said.
She said the three areas for reform that the government sees as
crucial to our future productivity and economic growth were skills
and participation, investment in physical capital and regulatory
improvements.
She said while investments in physical infrastructure would
improve productivity, it was the government's investment in the
National Broadband Network that was likely to unleash the greatest
gains.
"Importantly the NBN is an open access network that provides the
perfect platform for innovation and entrepreneurship," she
said.
On regulation, Ms Wong said regulation that was not fit for
purpose or as efficient as possible should be reformed or
removed.
Some of the most beneficial reforms that could be delivered
would require collaboration across Federal and State Governments,
the business sector and unions, she said.
Full speech
Event audio (member login required)
Minister for Resources and
Energy, The Hon Martin Ferguson AM MP
Price restrictions for gas sends the wrong message to
investors, Minister for Resources and Energy, Martin Ferguson, has
told CEDA's State of the Nation attendees.
"Access to lucrative export markets is what underpins
investment, accordingly Australia's free market policy has allowed
for major investments," he said.
"It is my view that restricting energy exports in a bid to
suppress energy prices would provide the wrong signals to potential
investors in Australia."
He said price restrictions only led to the inefficient
allocation of resources, and could ultimately lead to supply and
reliability issues.
Mr Ferguson said priorities for the government were its skills
strategy, to assist in getting workers to the right locations for
resources projects, and also reducing regulatory burden and double
handling.
There are currently 98 resource projects at an advanced stage of
development, he said and the Government's focus on skills would be
vital in helping ensure that these projects get off the ground
while commodity prices are high, because the earlier the projects
are established the greater the benefits.
On calls to increase domestic gas supply, he said "calls for
intervention in the market would only serve to dampen any appetite
for the very investment needed to bring on new gas supplies in
Australia".
"Artificially holding down gas prices, as a reservation policy
will do, only acts as a disincentive for gas extraction activity
and may risk gas shortages in the longer term," he said.
With regard to the role of gas domestically, he said: "Gas is
seen by many as a bridge to the future energy market creating lower
carbon emissions while the price of renewable energy becomes more
competitive," he said.
However, he said the role of gas may take longer to materialise
than previously expected, due to greater uptake of rooftop solar,
lower demand than expected from industry, milder weather patterns,
and greater response by customers to higher prices, who have
reduced usage.
Mr Ferguson said LNG had been the "star performer in energy
sector" but coal-seam gas would become increasingly important.
"Foreign investment I would put to you, has been vital to the
ongoing development of our unconventional gas resources for
domestic and international customers," he said.
However, he said an important step for the continued development
of unconventional energy would be getting "our social licence to
operate" back and government was working hard to ensure the right
regulatory processes were in place, with a uniform national
approach to assist industry and address debate around fracking and
water issues.
However, in addition he said the petroleum industry also needed
to improve community consultation.
"Some companies need to get better at how they engage with local
rural communities. The mining companies I think have historically
been better at that because it's been their bread and butter, but
the petroleum industry, to a large extent... this is new to them,"
he said.
Full speech
Event audio (member login required)
Australian Catholic
University, Adjunct Professor, Greg
Smith
Tax cuts between 2005 and 2008 were never affordable and the
current government had made the right decision not to cut the
company tax rate now, Australian Catholic University, Adjunct
Professor Greg Smith, told attendees at CEDA's State of the
Nation.
Speaking on Productivity, Welfare and Work: Rethinking our tax
structure, Mr Smith said tax collection in the last four years had
not reached the average of the previous eight years, and was not
going to get back to those levels until the second half of this
decade.
He said the tax cuts of the last three years of the Howard
Government and the first year of the Rudd Government were never
affordable and along with the GFC, which hit asset values and to a
lesser extent income flow, had reduced tax collection.
Tax collection rates would not return to the higher levels
without significant recovery in the economy and fiscal drag, with a
return through inflation of the tax burden on individuals, he
said.
On calls to improve investment in Australia, Mr Smith said we
already have the world's highest investment rate and "the idea that
we can increase the investment rate in Australia in the next five
years is ridiculous, it is completely absurd".
"We can try to restructure it and we should, we should try to
make it more efficient... but we are not going to improve without
an enormous amount of stress and trouble," he said.
"We can improve our productivity significantly by improving the
allocation of investment and that should be the focus of tax policy
concern."
Mr Smith also discussed the impact of our changing demography
and the need for increased mature age participation in the
workforce and changes to the structure of superannuation.
"I've been personally associated with creating the
superannuation industry in this country," he said.
"I don't feel very proud about that, I think it's an
achievement, yes, but it's not the answer."
Mr Smith said life expectancy had significantly increased with
the average number of years of retirement going from 12 to more
than 20 and "we cannot have retirement going for 25, 30 years".
"Super is basically an early retirement system. It is not really
dealing with the very high cost of aged care and health in late
retirement," he said.
"I'm not against superannuation but it is not fit for purpose at
the moment."
Event audio (member login required)
Centre for
International Security Studies, Adjunct Associate Professor, John
Lee
Better access for foreign firms in South East Asian countries is
likely in the future, Centre for International Security Studies,
Adjunct Associate Professor, John Lee, has told CEDA State of
the Nation attendees.
Speaking on the opportunities of the Asian Century, Mr Lee said
we have to be careful not to focus too much on China.
"Opportunities is one thing, getting access to opportunities is
another...and this is where sovereign risk comes in," he said.
He said China gave unusual advantages to state owned enterprises
even to the disadvantage to private Chinese companies.
"China allows only a very few joint ventures into the country
and this is designed to largely hasten technology and know-how
transfer, but the relative closed nature of the Chinese
domestic consumption market is also intrinsically tied to the
Chinese Communist Party's political and regime objectives and this
is unlikely to change in the future," he said.
"In contrast, most South East Asian countries, they may be
closed in some respects now, but my bet is they will offer much
better access to foreign firms (in the future)."
In addition he said: "India as we all know is a difficult place
to do business but the long term political trend is to be open to
doing business with foreign firms, unlike China."
"When it comes to opportunities I'd give two pieces of general
advice, first it is an Asian Pacific Century, an important
distinction," he said.
"Second, separate reality from the hype, avoid over reliance on
long-term linear extrapolations because they are almost always
wrong, don't rush to pick winners in a region ahead of time and
seek real rather than imaged opportunities as the evidence comes to
light."
Mr Lee also warned that we may see more nuclear armed Asian
countries in the future.
"Asia is rising on the back of six decades of relative peace and
stability underwritten by American power," he said.
"Substantially remove America from equation and we could see,
perhaps you'll likely see a nuclear armed Japan, a nuclear armed
South Korea, and possibly a nuclear armed Vietnam and a nuclear
armed Indonesia in the future."
Event audio (member login required)
Return to the news