Australia faces the most serious financial and economic challenges since CEDA was formed almost 50 years ago. CEDA will maintain a watching brief over other challenges in the context
of the global fi nancial crisis and its implications for Australia
CEDA hompage
»
research
»
Priority areas
»
GFC
GFC
The Global Financial crisis
In 2009 Australia and the world faced the most serious financial
and economic challenges since CEDA was formed almost 50 years ago.
Given that Australia's banking, other finances and investments are
heavily integrated with international finance we could not escape
the international impact of the tens of $ trillions of toxic debt
and unmonitored derivatives. A vast stock of geared products,
including roughly $60 trillion of Credit Default Swaps (c.f. world
GDP of about $50 trillion) traced back to housing loans, issued
against excessive housing finance in the US. Credit sources dried
up almost overnight on 15 September 2009 following the closure of
Lehman Brothers, a central player in derivatives. Because the CDS
did not involve words such as "guarantee" and "insurance" they
escaped regulation - a matter endorsed by then Fed Chairman Alan
Greenspan and left alone by the Congress. A pass-the-parcel
situation arose where it was virtually impossible to track toxic
liabilities. All felt vulnerable.
Government Debt to GDP Ratio - Actual and Projected

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2009
As the world's capital markets imploded from September 2008 and
threatened countries such as Australia, there were various measures
such as bank guarantees and fiscal stimulus aimed at preventing
what was seen as a likely recession of extreme proportions.
Unusually, however, this was an economic shock originating in the
US capital market; making it possible that the turnaround
could also be rapid to the extent that capital market problems and
confidence could be dealt with.
Key tools in the financial area were an elastic and quite
massive supply of central bank and Treasury funds to banks and
other financial institutions and sectors, in Australia and
elsewhere. There were also bank guarantees. In the Australian case
the actual and projected government Debt-to-GDP ratio was very low
c.f. the UK, US and Japan (see above). Thus a reversal of the
credit situation was more amenable in Australia and we also had a
degree of flexibility owing to earlier labour market, financial
sector, state enterprise and trade reforms.
To cut a long story short, our institutional structures and
financial regulations and general economic flexibility seem to have
served us well, relative to other economies, in that with the help
of guarantees the four leading banks have performed well, and other
financial institutions and markets have largely weathered the
storm.
While debates rage about the extent to which the mixed
international recovery at end 2009 is real, and as to whether the
contribution of rapid fiscal stimulus was the key to an early
recovery, the countries and notably Australia where financial
governance had been relatively strong showed the most rapid
capacity to bounce back in a sustainable manner. The remarkable
demand for our mineral `resources, notably from China and India,
also underpinned demand in what might have been a collapse of
economic activity associated with the threatened financial
system.
CEDA's recent work on the GFC is available below.