The changing nature of electricity generation investment



SHARE IT


Login

If you have forgotten your password please

click here


Associate Professor Tim Nelson is the Executive General Manager Economic Analysis at Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC), an independent body responsible for providing advice to Australian governments on the electricity and gas sector since 2005.

Australia’s electricity markets are in transition. What are the trends and implications for new investment types that may be required in the future? Oliver Nunn, Ryan Esplin, Alan Rai and Tim Nelson explore.

Australia’s electricity markets are in transition. Demand for electricity is declining in some jurisdictions, households are installing distributed solar PV and older, traditional large-scale electricity generation infrastructure is being replaced with new technologies. In this article, we explore these trends and their implications for the types of new investment that may be required in the future.

Trends affecting residual demand In recent years we have observed three trends that are changing the profile of residual electricity demand. Residual electricity demand is demand net of relatively low-cost forms of variable generation such as distributed solar PV and wind. These changes are: flat demand growth in the National Electricity Market (NEM); changes in the large scale generation mix; and the rapid up-take of behind-the-meter rooftop PV.

Flat demand growth

Figure 1: Annual growth rate of electricity demand in the NEM 1962- 2017


Source: Department of Environment and Energy

With the exception of Queensland, demand in each region of the NEM has been flat or falling over the past decade. This follows on from a broader trend of declining electricity demand growth rates in the NEM over the past 50 years (see Figure 1). This is largely a reflection of the changing structure of the economy, with a decline in energy-intensive sectors such as manufacturing, and an increase in energy efficiency amongst both large and small consumers. Flat demand growth is not unique to Australia with many other advanced economies experiencing a flat-lining of electricity demand growth in recent years.

Changes in the large-scale generation mix

There are two significant trends that have shifted the mix of large-scale generation in the NEM. First, a number of older power stations have been retired from service. And second, there has been a significant increase in investment in variable generation across the NEM. The term variable generation is used to refer to generation which is produced when fuel is available (e.g. solar PV when the sun is shining) irrespective of electricity demand. In 2018 alone, more than 4000 MW of intermittent capacity was added following the retirement of several older power stations in the period between 2012 and 2017. This is shown in Figure 2.
 
Figure 2: Changes in NEM generation capacity


Source: AEMC analysis

Rapid up-take of distributed generation

Australia has some of the highest penetrations of household solar PV of anywhere in the world. This rapid uptake of behind-the-meter solar PV is likely to continue. By the late 2030s, AEMO projects there will be around 20,000 MW of rooftop PV capacity in the NEM, a projected three-fold increase on current rooftop PV capacity.

Implications for residual demand and new generation investment

The combination of contracting demand growth and the surge of new variable generation capacity has significant implications for the optimal future generation mix. Renewable technologies, such as wind and solar PV have very low marginal costs. It follows that when wind farms and solar PVs generate power, they displace generation from traditional thermal generators. Therefore, to determine how much ‘room’ there is for a new ‘firm’ generation, we must remove the amount of generation provided by ‘non-firm’ technologies from the aggregate demand curve. The demand that is left over is termed residual demand. The confluence of the above factors, namely, flat demand with increasing intermittent generation leads to significant changes in the size and profile of residual demand.
 
Figure 3: Demand, large scale solar output and rooftop solar output in Queensland, 4 July 2018
   
 Source: AEMC analysis

By way of illustration, Figure 3 shows residual demand and solar generation from a typical winter day in Queensland:
  • the light blue area shows the component of underlying demand served by existing rooftop PV;
  • the dark blue area shows the total demand served by large scale solar generation; and
  • the brown area shows the residual demand in the system.
This analysis shows that low-marginal-cost generation, in the form of rooftop solar and large scale solar, have resulted in residual demand becoming more volatile and varied over the day.

Another version of this same trend is seen in South Australia. Figure 4 illustrates how residual demand has changed over time by considering the outcomes on a single day of the year in South Australia for 2012, 2013, 2016 and 2018. Over this period, the penetration of large- and small-scale renewables in South Australia increased markedly:
  • The light blue line shows system demand (i.e. the demand for electricity sourced from the grid net of rooftop solar). The effect of rooftop solar in lowering demand in the middle of the day, often referred to as the ‘duck curve’, is clear. Moreover, demand is also seen to be more volatile, rising and falling more often over the course of the day.
  • The dark blue line shows residual demand (i.e. system demand less output from large-scale wind and solar farms). The effect of intermittent renewable generation is to make residual demand more volatile.
  Figure 4: Profile of daily system demand and residual demand in South Australia, 9 May by year

Source: AEMC analysis
 
These market and technological trends mean that future generation will need to be sufficiently flexible to meet the changing profile of residual demand. Changes in residual demand mean traditional technologies that are designed to operate at high capacity factors, which have correspondingly low ramp rates and high start-up costs, are unlikely to be dispatched at the levels required for efficient operation. Flexible technologies, such as a peaking gas plant, pumped hydro and battery storage are likely to be better suited to the changing profile of residual demand.

It will be important that market participants continue to evolve the types of financial contracts available in the NEM to mitigate wholesale price risks. Contracts should preserve the relationship between the physical needs of the power system at any point in time and strong financial incentives on the plant to operate consistent with these requirements. This is particularly important for variable technologies that are not dispatchable.

This blog was authored in collaboration by Oliver Nunn, Ryan Esplin, Alan Rai and Tim Nelson.
 


Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
 Security code