Boost evaluation to end Budget waste

Australia must overhaul how it evaluates government programs to stop money being wasted on services and policies that don’t deliver, according to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia (CEDA).  

Finding what works focuses on improving the evaluation of community services for their effectiveness and value. This report outlines how governments can use data collection to build more disciplined and consistent program evaluation, and how to foster a culture that enables this.

Download report  

Finding what works, the third report in CEDA’s Disrupting Disadvantage series, found 95 per cent of Federal Government programs over the past decade had not been properly evaluated. 


The community rightfully expects that taxpayer funds are used to effectively improve economic and social outcomes for all citizens, but too often this is not the case,” CEDA Chief Executive Melinda Cilento said. 


The Albanese Government has committed to improve practice in this area, including the likely introduction of an Evaluator-General. 


We must take steps now to improve evaluation, starting with major community services. 


CEDA analysed 103 federal, state and territory program evaluations over the past decade covering a range of policy areas, using Auditor-General performance reports 


The 20 federal programs analysed cost more than $200 billion over the decade. We found 95 per cent, or 19 of 20, had not been appropriately evaluated. 


Of the 20 federal programs: 

  • A quarter (5 of 20 programs) had no evaluation framework; and 

  • Seventy per cent (14 of 20) had either an incomplete, inconsistent or poor evaluation framework. 


Australian governments spend around $64 billion per year on community services such as disability, aged care, social supports and child-protection services (excluding welfare payments).  


Based on our finding that 95 per cent of programs over the past decade had not been properly evaluated, at least $61 billion of community services spending a year is unlikely to be properly evaluated 


Over the past decade, federal and state government spending on community services has increased by roughly five per cent each year.  


We can’t keep increasing spending on these programs while they fail to make tangible progress on reducing poverty and disadvantage,” Ms Cilento said. 


CEDA’s recommendations to overhaul federal evaluation practices include: 


  • The Albanese Government’s planned Office of the Evaluator-General should foster and champion an evaluation culture among government departments and external providers; 

  • Incentivising evaluation, including legislating the review of existing major Commonwealth-funded programs at least every five years; 

  • Requiring evaluation frameworks to be submitted as part of budget processes, including appropriate resourcing for evaluation and data collection plans; 

  • Improved data access and availability to enable better evaluations; and 

  • Better governance and embedding an evaluation culture within the public sector. 


The recent royal commissions into aged care, disability and robodebt highlight the risks of poor or non-existent evaluation.  


Demands on government services keep rising even as budgets are under more pressure than ever,” Ms Cilento said. 


Meeting community expectations in a fiscally responsible way requires robust and consistent evaluation and learning from the evidence. 


“If we want to end the cycle of reviews and inquiries that gather dust on politicians’ desks, evaluation must be integrated into government processes.” 


Report author, CEDA Senior Economist Cassandra Winzar, says poverty in Australia is unacceptably high and we are not making progress in reducing poverty and disadvantage. 


This is in part due to governments’ failure to evaluate community services for their effectiveness and value,” Ms Winzar said. 


There is plenty of evidence showing what makes a good evaluation and how to conduct one, but it takes more than this. 


The bigger challenges are cultural change, political will and the capability to get it right.  


CEDA Chief Executive Melinda Cilento and Senior Economist Cassandra Winzar are available for further comment and interviews.  


For more information, please contact:  

Justine Parker, Media Manager and Content Specialist 

Mobile: 0436 379 688 | Email: 

Elizabeth ByrneAssociate Director, Strategic Communications & Advocacy             

Mobile: 0410 627 250 Email: 

About CEDA

CEDA – the Committee for Economic Development of Australia – is an independent, not-for-profit membership organisation.

We identify policy issues that matter for Australia’s future. We work to drive policies that deliver better economic, social and environmental outcomes for Australia. We deliver on our purpose by: Leveraging insights from our members to identify and understand the most important issues Australia faces. Facilitating collaboration and idea sharing to invoke imaginative, innovative and progressive policy solutions. Providing a platform to stimulate thinking, raise new ideas and debate critical and challenging issues. Influencing decision makers in government, business and the community by delivering objective information and expert analysis and advocating in support of our positions. CEDA's membership spans every state and territory and includes Australia's leading businesses, community organisations, government departments and academic institutions. The organisation was founded in 1960 by leading economist Sir Douglas Copland, and his legacy of applying economic analysis to practical problems to aid the development of Australia continues as we celebrate 60 years of influence, reform and impact across the nation.;