Explore our Progress 2050 Goal Tracker
Retrospective domestic gas reservation policies were ruled out but increased regulation and prospective gas reservation were both raised during CEDA’s State of the Nation 2013 energy options and security discussion.
03/07/2013
Retrospective domestic gas reservation policies were ruled out but increased regulation and prospective gas reservation were both raised during CEDA's State of the Nation 2013 energy options and security discussion.
Both the Minister for Resources and Energy, Gary Gray AO, and Shadow Minister for Energy and Resources, Ian Macfarlane, ruled out retrospective gas reservation policies.
However, Mr Macfarlane said the Coalition would consider a prospective policy for new projects.
"While the Coalition is clearly opposed to a mandatory blanket gas reservation policy, we are open to investigating alternative ideas," he said.
"Instead of a gas reservation policy applied retrospectively to existing projects it would be far more effective and less destructive to the industry - let alone the sovereign risk profile - to promote the idea of acreage reservation prospectively for domestic gas production (from) new projects where by certain areas are set aside wholly or in part for the extraction of gas for the domestic market.
"Under such a policy investors on both sides would know exactly where they stand and obviously it wouldn't apply to existing projects."
Mr Gray said the Australian Government did not agree that a domestic gas reservation would keep gas prices down.
"In keeping with our belief in open and competitive markets, the Australian Government does not agree that domestic gas reservation would keep gas prices down, or put more gas in the market," he said.
"In our view it would create uncertainty and deter investment in new gas supply."
However, he said that "without adequate access to gas for domestic users, governments will face increasing pressure to use the stick of regulation".
The cost of doing business in Australia and productivity was another key issue discussed, with Shell Australia incoming Country Chair Andrew Smith saying high costs pose a direct risk to the current pipeline of investment.
"We expect Australia to underpin the next phase of growth for our LNG portfolio," he said.
"This investment will generate considerable employment, national income and tax revenue.
"But while Australian has potential of 100 million tonnes per annum of proposed projects in development, a range of challenges including high infrastructure and labour costs and environmental constraints pose direct risks to the pipeline of this investment.
"With seven LNG projects currently in construction, we have become the highest cost nation to build the next LNG plant, in fact we are now 20 to 30 per cent more expensive than the United States and Canada."
"Competing demand for our workforce means we are paying people as young as 20 around $200,000 a year. Their bosses can be as young as 25 and get paid even more.
"We worry about how sustainable this is, how much longer can we afford to do this and can we afford to miss the window of opportunity Australia has for constructing new projects?
"How much time do we have before our competitors in North America and East Africa catch up and start stealing our customers?"
Mr Smith said we need to recognise that we may need help building these projects and skilled migration will be important.
There are signs that the Government recognises the huge opportunity for Australia from leveraging our comparative advantage in the net zero world, Rod Sims told the CEDA Climate and Energy Forum. In addition to our just over 1% of world emissions now occurring in Australia, we could remove around another 6-9% of global emissions that other countries will find very difficult to abate by making, for example, green iron, green aluminium, green transport fuels, green urea and green silicon in Australia. If Australia achieves green energy intensive exports at the lower end of reducing world emissions by 6-9% it can, over time, achieve additional export revenue of $250-300bn per annum. This is way greater than the $120-220bn per annum revenue we receive from coal and gas exports, which will decline over time.
Read more Energy February 29, 2012The gas and shale gas revolution, its prospects for continuation in the USA and possible replication elsewhere were the topics covered by Chatham House, Senior Research Fellow (Energy), Professor Paul Stevens at a CEDA event in Queensland.
Read more Energy October 19, 2011Open and accurate conversation about fuel choices including renewables and Coal Seam Gas (CSG) is needed, Managing Director of Origin Energy has told a CEDA Energy series audience.
Read more